Uncharted Territory

March 25, 2008

Implications of “peak oil” – Tim’s Translation Service

Filed under: Books/resources, Climate change, Energy policy, Global warming, Science — Tim Joslin @ 6:57 pm

No sooner had I digested the Target Atmospheric CO2 paper than another one (pdf)* arrived, courtesy of James Hansen’s mailing list.

The paper “Implications of ‘peak oil’ for atmospheric CO2 and climate”, Pushker A. Kharecha and James E. Hansen (pdf)* makes a similar argument to that in “Target Atmospheric CO2”, though there are some differences.

I’ll try to keep the translation brief this time.


The paper seeks to show that we can keep CO2 below 450ppm [Hansen argued for less in “Target Atmospheric CO2”] by avoiding burning coal to the atmosphere, and using a high price of CO2 to deter the use of unconventional (e.g. tar sand) and other expensive sources of oil. Various Peak Oil scenarios imply that we can keep below 450ppm CO2, based on the Bern carbon cycle model, with both a static pulse response function (PRF) and a dynamic PRF. That is, even if some carbon cycle feedbacks are allowed for, CO2 can be kept below 450ppm if we burn all the existing conventional oil and natural gas reserves.

Points of note

1. The authors acknowledge that the concept of “reserves” of fossil fuels is flawed – if the price of oil (say) goes up, “reserves” magically grow, simply because more of the resources become economically exploitable.

2. The authors acknowledge that they have provided only “an approximate lower bound for the proportion of fossil fuel CO2 emissions that remain airborne.” i.e. they are being optimistic. But they don’t consider that climate feedbacks will kick in below 450ppm, so as long as we stay below that we’ll be OK.

3. We have to keep “cumulative global emissions from coal between the present and 2050… to ~100GtC or less” (note that the IPCC considers proven global coal reserves to be >1200GtC).

*Postscript (9/4/08): There were some problems with the links to the Hansen and Kharecha a paper. These now refer to teh Arxiv version, which will hopefully stay there.



  1. […] Baffled by BERN, but beware of biofuels! Filed under: Biofuels, Books/resources, Climate change, Energy policy, Global warming, Science — Tim Joslin @ 7:53 pm Today’s project – well it was going to be this morning’s project – was to evaluate the two papers I recently tried to summarise one here: from Hansen et al and from Kharecha and Hansen. […]

    Pingback by Baffled by BERN, but beware of biofuels! « Uncharted Territory — March 27, 2008 @ 7:55 pm

  2. […] Aviation, Global warming — Tim Joslin @ 5:47 pm Me & Big Jim Hansen, we’re like that {written with a crossed finger gesture, even though it probably means something unfortunate in some […]

    Pingback by Jim & Tim « Uncharted Territory — February 2, 2009 @ 5:48 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: