Uncharted Territory

February 29, 2008

It’s different over there…

Filed under: Economics, Housing market, Media — Tim Joslin @ 3:31 pm

For starters, the Yanks don’t have the term “negative equity”.  I tried to tell them by commenting on this CNN story, but it seems CNN is another site where they get you to write a comment and nothing happens. I won’t bother in future.

But this NYT story is breath-taking.  It seems the US is the land of the free, yes sirree, you’re free to walk away from your mortgage if it turns “upside-down”!  Unbelievable.  I hope they realise that no-one (stupid foreigners) is ever going to lend them (the US) money to buy houses ever again.  And they’ll probably be very careful what else they lend it for.  Talk about moral hazard, eh, Merv?

Advertisements

5 Comments »

  1. Wayull, sorta. US mortgage law is set State by State, so it’s difficult to say that it’s one way or the other.
    But in general, on average, primary mortgages are non-recourse. The lender has the security but not a general charge against the borrower.
    Second mortgages, equity release etc, they (again, generally) do.
    Paul Krugman’s done at least one column on it: “Jingle Mail” is the phrase I think, just sending the keys back to hte mortgage house in hte mail.

    Comment by Tim Worstall — February 29, 2008 @ 3:57 pm

  2. […] a house?  Well, the answer is it all depends.  In some US States, the bank takes all the risk, as I noted before.  Yeap, can’t pay the mortgage, just walk away, yippedee doodaa!  And this, of course, is […]

    Pingback by How to play dominoes « Uncharted Territory — March 19, 2008 @ 5:21 pm

  3. […] are important. The devil is always in the detail. For example, it is absolutely critical, as I pointed out a while ago, and as Daniel Gros notes in today’s FT, that US mortgages are “no […]

    Pingback by More on the immorality and hazard of policy based on moral hazard « Uncharted Territory — March 26, 2008 @ 3:42 pm

  4. […] of so-called sub-prime loans) proven to be unable to pay their interest, the law (in some states) does not even compel them to do […]

    Pingback by Risk Denial « Uncharted Territory — October 27, 2008 @ 9:03 pm

  5. […] of the economy.  I repeat, house-price falls per se will not lead to defaults in the UK (because we don’t have no recourse loans).  As long as interest rates don’t spiral up, unemployment will be the main cause of […]

    Pingback by Clarifying Deleveraging, or, Saving the Economy « Uncharted Territory — December 2, 2008 @ 7:44 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: