Uncharted Territory

February 7, 2008

Evaluating biofuels

Filed under: Biofuels, Energy policy, Global warming — Tim Joslin @ 7:07 pm

Government reports on biofuels talk about the “GHG savings” of biofuels made from particular crops (often referred to as biofuel “feedstocks”). This is fundamentally the wrong approach. In the attached paper, Biofuel Payback Periods (pdf), I present a method of assessing the worth of growing biofuel crops in terms of the potential of the land on which they are grown to store carbon if biofuels aren’t grown.

Just considering “GHG savings” is like comparing company profits without taking any account of the company’s size (e.g. the capital employed) – for example, £1m profits in a year might be a good performance for the local filling station but would be a disaster for, say, BP.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. […] made a few small changes to the document I previously posted on this topic.  Sorry about the delay (blame Microsoft/Adobe: it’s a long story).  Anyway, […]

    Pingback by Biofuel Payback Periods revisited « Uncharted Territory — March 13, 2008 @ 8:50 am

  2. […] obvious measure of whether biofuels are indeed sustainable. I’ve made a few small changes to the document I previously posted on this topic. Sorry about the delay (blame Microsoft/Adobe: it’s a long story). Anyway, here is […]

    Pingback by Zero Carbon » Biofuel Payback Periods revisited — March 17, 2008 @ 5:33 pm


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: